This page helps CNC process engineers, programmers, and tooling buyers lock a tap drill size for 5/16-18 UNC and 5/16-24 UNF: recover an incomplete "5/16" callout by verifying TPI first, read the common cut-tap chart rows (letter F for 5/16-18 and letter I for 5/16-24 at about 75 percent engagement on many public charts), keep form-tap prep holes and bolt clearance holes off the cut-tap row, hold inch and millimetre units honest on the traveler, then confirm with the drawing class and tap maker chart before RFQ. The live multi-system hub stays on the tap drill size chart. The live 1/4-inch 20/28 deep dive stays on 1/4-20 tap drill size. This page is the 5/16-inch 18/24 OWN; it is not a full metric/UNC/UNF encyclopedia, a 1/4 page, a 10-32 page, a bolt clearance-hole chart, a form-versus-cut encyclopedia, or an invented ranking, price, life claim, or unsourced size matrix.

Start from the live form tap vs cut tap guide when method (form versus cut) is still open. Browse live constructions on taps and carbide drill bits. When a thread mill may replace tapping, use the live thread milling vs tapping aluminum guide and browse thread mills. Hole-process framing sits on the live precision holemaking selection guide. Sister deep dives for 10-32 and a bolt clearance-hole chart will be linked after they publish (soft-note until live). End with RFQ when the package is ready: custom cutting tool RFQ.

Quick answer

  1. Lock major size and TPI before any drill letter: "5/16" alone is not enough. Write 5/16-18 UNC (coarse, 18 threads per inch) or 5/16-24 UNF (fine, 24 TPI) on the traveler. Swapping TPI while keeping the same major diameter is how the wrong chart row gets used.
  2. 5/16-18 cut-tap starter (public chart consensus ~75% engagement): many published UNC cut-tap charts list a letter F drill (0.2570 inch). Treat that as chart consensus, not an HC laboratory measurement. Confirm drawing class, material, and the tap maker chart before production.
  3. 5/16-24 cut-tap contrast: many published UNF cut-tap charts list a letter I drill (0.2720 inch) near the same ~75% basis. Do not reuse the F from the 5/16-18 row. Fine pitch leaves less material to remove at the same major diameter, so the cut-tap drill is larger.
  4. Form tap, clearance, and units stay gated: a form (roll) tap needs a larger prep hole from the maker chart; a bolt clearance hole is intentionally larger so the shank passes and is not a tap drill; write decimal inches (or named letter) and convert carefully if the shop also holds metric drills. Next step: name material, hole type, cut versus form, and drill with units, then open RFQ if needed.

Selection path (stop when a field is missing):

StepWhat you lockIf missing
1 Major + TPI5/16-18 UNC or 5/16-24 UNF (or reject other 5/16 callouts)Stop; recover the print callout
2 MethodCut tap, form tap, or open; ductility noteDo not pick a drill from habit alone
3 Percent of thread / classTarget engagement or thread class and check methodKeep drill open; do not invent a %
4 Prep-hole sizeF / I (or maker form size) + decimal inch + chart familyDo not tap from a clearance hole
5 Units and material / hole typeInch letter vs mm stock; grade/condition; blind vs through; depthEscalate before production
6 Trial and RFQFirst-off gauge result + matched RFQ packageOpen RFQ with incomplete SKU if needed

Jump: 5/16 vs TPI · 5/16-18 cut-tap · 5/16-24 contrast · Form and units · Worked examples · RFQ · Confirm · FAQ

Distinguish 5/16-inch major diameter from 18 and 24 TPI

Shop slang that says "a five-sixteenths tap" without TPI is incomplete. Unified inch geometry names both the major diameter and the threads-per-inch series. Unified naming literacy is framed in the ASME B1.1 family; use public standards literacy such as this codes and standards portal for naming only, not as a pasted B1.1 substitute.

  • 5/16-inch major diameter: the nominal major size is 0.3125 inch for both 5/16-18 and 5/16-24. That shared major is why teams confuse the two rows.
  • 5/16-18 UNC: Unified National Coarse at 18 TPI. Common on general mechanical fasteners in this size class. Coarse pitch removes more material for a given major diameter, so the cut-tap prep hole is smaller than the matching fine row.
  • 5/16-24 UNF: Unified National Fine at 24 TPI. Common when a finer pitch is specified for adjustment, thin wall, or vibration-sensitive stacks. Fine pitch needs a larger cut-tap drill than 5/16-18 at the same major.
  • Not this page's OWN: other 5/16 callouts (for example special pitches), metric M8 near-size swaps, 1/4 deep dives, 10-32 deep dives, NPT, and bolt clearance-hole fit classes belong elsewhere. The multi-system starter tables stay on the live tap drill size chart. The 1/4-inch 20/28 book stays on the live 1/4-20 tap drill size page.

Public screw tables such as this laboratory UNC/UNF screw table help teams name size and TPI side by side. Metrology literacy such as this public metrology laboratory entry and this weights and measures overview supports keeping inch decimals honest on the traveler. Unit conversion literacy such as this NIST SP 811 units guidance and this weights and measures program overview supports inch/mm discipline when a shop also holds metric taps.

5/16-18 UNC cut-tap drill (public chart consensus)

For a cut tap on 5/16-18 UNC, many published shop charts list a letter F drill at 0.2570 inch, aimed at roughly 75% of full thread for general mechanical work. That percent-of-thread basis is a shop convention used on many public charts; it is not a universal strength guarantee and not an HC measured result for every grade.

Source boundary: ASME B1.1-style Unified inch cut-tap chart practice as reflected in public UNC tap-drill references (cross-checked against consolidated public charts such as this UNC UNF and metric tap drill chart and this tap drill reference table). Engineering applicability: cut taps only; ductile or free-cutting materials at commercial thread targets; blind or through holes when chip exit is planned. Verify against the drawing thread class and the tap maker chart before production. Charts can disagree by one stock size; when they do, prefer the print and the tap maker over habit.

ThreadSeriesTPITypical cut-tap drillDecimal (in)Approx. basisConfirm when…
5/16-18UNC18F0.2570~75% cut-tap chart consensusForm tap, hard material needing lower %, or maker chart differs

CNC threading literacy such as this CNC threading and tapping overview and this tap drill chart sizes overview frames percent-of-thread talk without turning this page into a feeds library. Public distributor help such as this tap drill sizes help page is literacy only, not an HC trial. Threading education such as this threading knowledge overview and this tapping knowledge overview adds process naming only (neutral anchors; not a brand ranking).

Common process notes for the 5/16-18 cut-tap path:

  • Blind holes: leave unused depth for the tap chamfer; chip packing breaks taps on 18 TPI when coolant or pecking is weak.
  • Hard or tough alloys: shops often use a slightly larger drill (lower %) to protect the tap. That is a conditional trade, not a free strength upgrade. Do not invent a life percentage as an HC result.
  • Soft aluminum: an F cut-tap row may still fit, but form tapping abandons F for the maker form window.
  • Gauge the finished thread to the print method. Class labels and percent-of-thread talk are related but not interchangeable.

5/16-24 UNF cut-tap contrast (same major, different drill)

For a cut tap on 5/16-24 UNF, many published shop charts list a letter I drill at 0.2720 inch, again near a ~75% engagement convention on public charts. The major diameter is still 0.3125 inch; the finer pitch is why the prep hole grows relative to 5/16-18.

Source boundary: same ASME B1.1-style Unified inch cut-tap chart family and public UNF tap-drill consensus as the 5/16-18 row above. Applicability: cut taps; commercial ~75% target; verify class and maker chart. This compare is conditional on cut method and a named engagement basis. It is not an unconditional ranking that "fine is better" or that letter I always wins.

ThreadSeriesTPITypical cut-tap drillDecimal (in)Approx. basisConfirm when…
5/16-18UNC18F0.2570~75% cut-tap chart consensusPrint is actually 5/16-24; form method; hard material
5/16-24UNF24I0.2720~75% cut-tap chart consensusPrint is actually 5/16-18; form method; thin wall / class shift

How to read the contrast: at the same 0.3125 inch major, moving from 18 TPI to 24 TPI reduces the material that must be removed for a given engagement target, so the published cut-tap drill steps up from F (0.2570 in) to I (0.2720 in). Reusing F on a 5/16-24 callout is a common mix-up when the traveler only says "5/16". Reusing I on a 5/16-18 callout leaves the thread under-engaged relative to the chart intent.

Illustration: Schematic comparison of 5/16-18 and 5/16-24 tap drill hole bands without text labels

Schematic illustration: not a catalogue ranking or cutting-data table. Confirm TPI, drill diameter, percent-of-thread target, and cut versus form on your drawing and tap maker chart.

National standards literacy such as this national standards overview supports naming thread families only. Engineering calculator literacy such as this engineering calculators portal helps name engagement math without inventing HC life data.

Form-tap prep holes, clearance holes, and unit boundaries

Three other traps get confused with 5/16-18 and 5/16-24 tap drills. Keep them on separate traveler lines.

  • Form (roll / cold-form) taps: material displaces into the thread form, so the prep hole is larger than the cut-tap F or I for the same nominal callout. Reusing a cut-tap drill on a form tap often causes swell, incomplete crests, or excess torque. Choose method first on the live form tap vs cut tap guide, then use the tap maker form-drill chart for the SKU you will run.
  • No invented form matrix here: this page does not paste a universal letter matrix for 5/16 form taps as an HC measured guarantee. Maker charts differ by geometry, coating, and material window. Prefer "confirm with tap maker / drawing" over an unsourced cell.
  • Ductility and lubrication gates: industry tendency favors form taps on ductile workpieces (many aluminum alloys, low-carbon steels, some stainless grades) and cut taps on brittle or hard-to-form materials (many cast irons, some hardened conditions). Forming usually needs a robust lubricating film; cut tapping often prioritizes chip wash. Grade certificates beat nicknames.
  • Bolt clearance holes: a clearance hole is intentionally larger so the bolt shank passes freely without engaging threads in that plate. Clearance is not a tap drill. Do not tap a clearance hole and call it 5/16-18 or 5/16-24 prep. A dedicated clearance-hole chart (planned path /resources/bolt-clearance-hole-chart) will cover fit classes after it publishes (soft-note until live).
  • Unit conversion boundaries: write the letter (F or I) and the decimal inch on the traveler. If the shop pulls metric stock, convert with a documented factor and round to an available drill after naming engagement intent. Do not "metricize" by eye, and do not mix an F cut-tap row with an unmarked millimetre drill from a nearby M8 chart. Near-size metric swaps are not this page's OWN.
Axis5/16 cut-tap tendency5/16 form-tap tendencyUnit / clearance tendencyKeep open when…
Hole size vs majorSmaller core (F or I by TPI)Larger prep than cut rowClearance larger still; shank passesMaker form chart or fit class missing
% thread / fit talkOften ~75% on public cut chartsMaker-specific mid bandClose / normal / loose fit classesAcceptance method unnamed
MaterialBroader, including brittle gradesNeeds ductility to flowPlate stack / coating notesCertificate grade unknown
Units on travelerLetter + decimal inch namedMaker size + units namedDocumented inch/mm conversionMixed stock unmarked
RFQ noteState cut + TPI + F/IState form / roll + maker sizeState clearance or units, not habitMethod or hole intent undecided

This compare table is conditional. It is not an unconditional ranking of form over cut, of 24 TPI over 18 TPI, or of any brand. Fastener mechanics literacy such as this bolt science portal supports naming engagement talk without inventing case counts.

Illustration: Schematic cut-tap versus form-tap prep and inch-metric unit boundary without ranking labels

Schematic illustration: boundaries only, not a catalogue ranking. Confirm tap-drill versus clearance versus form-prep intent and units on the drawing before picking a drill.

Toolholding literacy such as this tool holder technology overview and cutting-data literacy such as this cutting data notes portal support naming sync tapping and holder stiffness beside drill choice. Research society literacy such as this CIRP research portal frames process research boundaries only.

Worked examples (5/16-18 and 5/16-24 intent gates)

These examples answer common search intents at dedicated-page depth. Each still needs drawing class and maker confirmation before production. They are teaching aids, not shop results.

Intent exampleCallout to lockCommon cut-tap starterPage note
5/16-18 tap drill size5/16-18 UNCF (0.2570 in)~75% public chart consensus; verify maker
5 16 18 tap drill size5/16-18 UNCF (0.2570 in)Write TPI; "5/16" alone is incomplete
Drill bit size for 5 16 18 tap5/16-18 UNC + cut methodF (0.2570 in)Form method abandons F
5/16-24 tap drill size5/16-24 UNFI (0.2720 in)Same major; larger cut-tap drill
5 16 24 tap drill5/16-24 UNFI (0.2720 in)Do not use F from the 18 TPI row
Form tap on 5/16-18 or 5/16-24Same callout + form methodLarger than cut-tap rowMaker form chart only; no invented matrix
Clearance for 5/16 bolt (not tap)Clearance fit classNot F / not I as tap drillSoft-note clearance chart until live
Inch letter vs mm stockNamed units + conversionF/I with decimal inch firstDo not eye-swap to nearest M8 drill

Source boundary: same cut-tap chart families as the tables above (ASME B1.1-style / public UNC-UNF consensus at ~75%). Form and clearance rows stay qualitative. Soft-noted sister paths until live: 10-32 deep dive (/resources/10-32-tap-drill-size), bolt clearance-hole chart (/resources/bolt-clearance-hole-chart).

BoundaryLock on the sheetFail signalDo not invent
TPI / series5/16-18 UNC or 5/16-24 UNFWrong engagement or gauge failFake "universal 5/16 drill"
% thread / classTarget and check methodGauge fail or tap breakFake strength % as HC data
MaterialGrade, condition, ductility noteTorn crests, swell, breakLife % from grade slang
Hole type / depthBlind/through, unused depthChip pack or incomplete formPrice or ROI from depth
Drill vs clearance vs formNamed intent on travelerLoose bolt or missing threadUnsourced form letter matrix
UnitsLetter + decimal inch; documented mm if neededWrong stock pulledEye metric swap to M8 chart

Procurement checklist (RFQ inputs)

Send what you know. Leave life, price, and unverified cycle-time fields blank. Do not invent an unconditional best-drill ranking for 5/16-18 versus 5/16-24.

  1. Drawing revision and thread callout (5/16-18 UNC or 5/16-24 UNF, class if known).
  2. Cut tap, form tap, or open method; ductility note if known.
  3. Percent-of-thread or engagement target and how it will be checked.
  4. Proposed tap-drill size with units (F / I and/or decimal inch) and chart family used; for form taps, maker form size instead of the cut row.
  5. Unit note if the shop also holds millimetre stock (documented conversion, not eye swap).
  6. Material grade, condition, and coolant or forming-oil intent.
  7. Blind versus through, thread depth, unused depth, interruptions, thin walls.
  8. Machine sync / rigid tapping notes, holder type, and stick-out method if known.
  9. Acceptance gauges or inspection method; first-off notes.
  10. Identifiers needed for repeat orders.

Browse live constructions here: taps and carbide drill bits. When a thread mill may be the better path, browse thread mills. Open the request form when the package is ready: custom cutting tool RFQ.

Confirm the specification with engineering support

Before production ramp, confirm the 5/16 callout with TPI, cut versus form, prep-hole size with units, percent-of-thread or class intent, material condition, hole type and depth, and acceptance method. Hand the package to a product and RFQ path for a matched tap and drill recommendation, not a catalogue guess. HENTRY / HC supports drawing-based tap and carbide drill proposals. No price, MOQ, or unverified lead time is stated on this page.

5/16-inch tap or solid carbide drill for 5/16 tap drill size selection (product photo; no price or life claims on image)

Specification fields to confirm

  • Proposed tap model or drawing (cut or form) and matching drill designation (F, I, or maker form size).
  • Thread callout: 5/16-18 UNC or 5/16-24 UNF, class if known.
  • Percent-of-thread or engagement target and check method.
  • Material grade / condition and lubricant mode.
  • Blind / through, depth, unused clearance, interruptions.
  • Unit system on the traveler (inch letter/decimal; documented mm if needed).
  • Machine sync / holder / stick-out notes if known.
  • Inspection and sample acceptance expectations.
  • Identifiers needed for repeat orders.

Trial plan (minimum)

  • Same drawing revision and acceptance criteria as the checklist.
  • First-off record of torque feel, chip or form signal, gauge result, and hole size before compensation edits.
  • Change one variable at a time when comparing F versus I, percent of thread, or cut versus form under the same material and acceptance intent.
  • Stop when torque grows abnormally, crests look incomplete, gauges fail, or the tap breaks.
  • Do not claim a drill size "won" without those controls.

Review listed constructions here: explore taps · explore carbide drill bits · explore thread mills. Research and practice portals such as this CIRP research portal (also cited above) and tooling resource literacy such as this tooling resources overview support industry literacy only.

Request a 5/16 tap drill / tap recommendation

Suggested enquiry subject: 5/16 tap drill - [5/16-18 or 5/16-24] - [cut/form] - [material] - [blind/through] - [drill size]

5/16 Tap Drill Size FAQ

What size drill bit for a 5/16-18 tap?

For a cut tap on 5/16-18 UNC, published shop charts commonly list a letter F drill (0.2570 inch) at about 75 percent of full thread. Confirm the print class, material, and whether the method is cut or form. A form tap needs a larger prep hole from the tap maker chart. This answer is chart consensus, not an HC measured life or strength percentage.

What size drill bit for a 5/16-24 tap?

For a cut tap on 5/16-24 UNF, many public charts list a letter I drill (0.2720 inch) near the 75 percent basis. Do not reuse the F from the 5/16-18 row. Form taps still need the maker form-drill window, which is larger than the cut-tap row.

Why is the 5/16-24 cut-tap drill larger than the 5/16-18 drill?

Both share a 0.3125 inch major diameter, but 24 TPI is a finer pitch than 18 TPI. At a comparable engagement target, less material must be removed, so published cut-tap charts step from about F (0.2570 inch) up to about I (0.2720 inch). Always lock TPI on the traveler before picking a letter drill.

Can I use the same drill for a form tap on 5/16-18?

No. Form taps displace material into the thread form, so the prep hole must be larger than the cut-tap F. Reusing the cut-tap drill often causes swell, incomplete crests, or excess torque. Choose method first, then use the tap maker form-drill chart. This page does not invent a universal form letter matrix.

Is a bolt clearance hole the same as a 5/16-18 tap drill?

No. A tap drill leaves material so the tap can cut or form the internal thread. A bolt clearance hole is intentionally larger so the bolt shank passes without engaging threads in that plate. Do not treat clearance sizes as tap drills. A dedicated clearance-hole chart will cover fit classes after it publishes.

How should I handle inch letter drills versus millimetre stock?

Write the letter (F or I) and the decimal inch on the traveler first. If you must pull millimetre stock, use a documented conversion and round to an available drill only after naming the engagement intent. Do not eye-swap a 5/16 cut-tap row to a nearby metric M8 chart. Confirm units before production.

Which inputs should I send in an RFQ for 5/16 tap drill selection?

Send drawing revision, 5/16-18 or 5/16-24 callout, cut versus form or open, percent-of-thread or class intent, proposed drill size with units, material and lubricant intent, blind versus through and depth notes, acceptance method, and trial notes. Leave unverified life and price fields blank.

When does this page not apply?

It does not apply when you need invented life percentages, prices, ROI, or unverified case counts; when you need an unconditional best-drill ranking; when you need a full metric/UNC/UNF encyclopedia instead of the 5/16 18/24 OWN; when you need a dedicated 1/4, 10-32, or clearance-hole book; when you need a pasted universal form-tap size matrix; or when TPI, method, units, and acceptance notes are missing. Fix the inputs first.

Sources and related guides

Outbound references support Unified inch thread naming, public UNC/UNF tap-drill chart literacy, tapping and threading education, metrology and units portals, toolholding and cutting-data literacy, and manufacturing research portals cited in the body. Manufacturer-specific tap drill charts remain tied to their own products. The decision walkthrough is an HC editorial teaching aid, not a measured customer result. Sources checked 24 October 2026 (Asia/Shanghai).

  • Codes and standards portal (public standards entry; linked in body)
  • Laboratory UNC/UNF screw table (public lab table; linked in body)
  • UNC UNF and metric tap drill chart (third-party reference; linked in body)
  • Tap drill reference table (third-party reference; linked in body)
  • Tap drill chart sizes overview (third-party education; linked in body)
  • CNC threading and tapping overview (third-party education; linked in body)
  • Tap drill sizes help page (third-party distributor education; linked in body)
  • Threading knowledge overview (third-party education; linked in body)
  • Tapping knowledge overview (third-party education; linked in body)
  • Public metrology laboratory entry (public metrology entry; linked in body)
  • Weights and measures overview (public metrology entry; linked in body)
  • NIST SP 811 units guidance (public metrology entry; linked in body)
  • Weights and measures program overview (public metrology entry; linked in body)
  • National standards overview (public standards entry; linked in body)
  • Engineering calculators portal (third-party tooling education; linked in body)
  • Tool holder technology overview (third-party education; linked in body)
  • Cutting data notes portal (third-party tooling education; linked in body)
  • CIRP research portal (third-party research society; linked in body)
  • Bolt science portal (third-party fastener mechanics literacy; linked in body)
  • Tooling resources overview (third-party tooling literacy; linked in body)

Related live guides: tap drill size chart · 1/4-20 tap drill size · form tap vs cut tap · thread milling vs tapping aluminum · precision holemaking selection guide · taps · carbide drill bits · thread mills · Knowledge hub · custom cutting tool RFQ. A dedicated 10-32 tap-drill page and a bolt clearance-hole chart will be linked after they publish (soft-note until live).