Vacuum chamber component machining
Chamber bodies, gas-delivery parts and seal interfaces — where the leak path and the trapped volume decide the process.
Open chamber parts →If your part is a general aluminum housing with no cleanliness or vacuum requirement, the General Mechanical hub is the better entry. This hub assumes the part will be judged on what comes off it, not only on what it measures.
Semiconductor work is not harder to machine than hydraulic work. It is harder to accept, because the failure modes are not visible on the inspection report:
This hub stays at qualification level. Feature-level cutting routes, channel geometry and flatness handling live on the three subpages — they are not restated here.
| Need | Common path | HENTRY entry |
|---|---|---|
| Faces and pockets in aluminum plate | PCD for non-ferrous faces where smearing or tool life is the limit; carbide where the geometry is the limit | PCD Milling Cutter · PCD Helical End Mill |
| Gas passages and bolt patterns | Carbide drill matched to the alloy, with a deburr plan written into the sequence | Carbide Drill for Aluminum · Carbide Drill for Stainless |
| Seal grooves and O-ring faces | Form or groove geometry cut clean in one pass, because a second pass adds a witness line | Grooving Tools · Custom End Mills |
| Small features and vent holes | Micro drills with a defined entry, since a wandering micro hole becomes a trapped pocket | Micro Carbide Drills |
| Edge breaks on sealing and handling faces | Chamfer or spotface geometry that cuts rather than rubs | PCD Chamfer / Spotface |
Chamber bodies, gas-delivery parts and seal interfaces — where the leak path and the trapped volume decide the process.
Open chamber parts →End effectors, chucks, lift pins and frame structures — flatness, edge quality and particle generation on lightweight aluminum.
Open wafer handling →Liquid cold plates and micro-channel parts — fin geometry, channel burr and the brazing face that has to stay flat.
Open cooling plates →Both, and they are not separable. Cleaning removes loose material; it cannot remove an edge that is folded over and waiting to break away. A cut edge and a smeared edge can measure the same roughness and behave differently in service. That is why the edge geometry is reviewed with the cleaning step rather than after it.
No. PCD is the right answer where the limit is smearing, built-up edge or tool life on a long aluminum run. Where the limit is a deep pocket, a thin rib or an interrupted cut, carbide geometry wins and PCD adds cost without benefit. The material grade and the feature decide, not the industry label.
By not designing the problem into the process where possible: venting, through-holes, or a drilling sequence that lets chips leave the way they came in. Where the print fixes a blind hole, the tool and the sequence are chosen so the bottom is cut rather than packed. The chamber component subpage covers this in detail.
Not from this hub. Those materials fail by chipping and fracture rather than by burr, and the process chain is different. Raise them separately on the RFQ and they are reviewed as their own case.
Under Semiconductor Cooling Plate Machining. The channel geometry, the fin wall thickness and the brazing face flatness are a milling and clamping problem rather than a drilling problem, which is why it sits on its own page.
Primary tooling entries for this hub: PCD milling cutters, carbide drills for aluminum and stainless, grooving geometry and micro drills. Downstream finish expectations are confirmed before quoting.